American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol.20 221-232 August 2011. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0091)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Iverach, L.
Right arrow Articles by Onslow, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Iverach, L.
Right arrow Articles by Onslow, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Review

Anxiety and Stuttering: Continuing to Explore a Complex Relationship

Lisa Iveracha
Ross G. Menziesa
Sue O'Briana
Ann Packmana
Mark Onslowa

a Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Australia

Correspondence to Mark Onslow: mark.onslow{at}sydney.edu.au

Purpose: The relationship between anxiety and stuttering has been widely studied. However, a review conducted more than 10 years ago (Menzies, Onslow, & Packman, 1999) identified 5 methodological issues thought to preclude consistent research findings regarding the nature of this relationship. The purpose of the present review was to determine whether methodological improvements have occurred since the Menzies et al. (1999) review.

Method: Literature published since the Menzies et al. review was evaluated with regard to the 5 methodological issues identified in that review: (a) the construct of anxiety, (b) trait anxiety measures, (c) participant numbers, (d) treatment status of participants, and (e) speaking tasks.

Results: Despite some remaining ambiguous findings, research published since the Menzies et al. review has provided far stronger evidence of a relationship between stuttering and anxiety, and has focused more on social anxiety, expectancies of social harm, and fear of negative evaluation.

Conclusion: The aims of future research should be to improve research design, increase statistical power, employ multidimensional measures of anxiety, and further develop anxiolytic treatment options for people who stutter.

Key Words: stuttering, anxiety, review, social phobia, fear of negative evaluation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
R. J. Ingham, J. C. Ingham, and A. K. Bothe
Integrating Functional Measures With Treatment: A Tactic for Enhancing Personally Significant Change in the Treatment of Adults and Adolescents Who Stutter
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2012; 21(3): 264 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]