Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current
• Archive
• Contact us
• Help
• Custom Print FAQ

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Custom Print Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schlosser, R. W. Articles by Wendt, O. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schlosser, R. W. Articles by Wendt, O. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Effects of Augmentative and Alternative Communication Intervention on Speech Production in Children With Autism: A Systematic Review

Oliver Wendt
Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN

Contact author: Ralf W. Schlosser, Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, Northeastern University, 151B Forsyth, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail: r.schlosser{at}neu.edu.

Purpose: This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention on speech production in children with autism or pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified.

Method: A systematic review methodology was utilized to limit bias in searching, selecting, coding, and synthesizing relevant treatment studies. This involved a multifaceted search for studies written between 1975 and May 2007 using various bibliographic databases, dissertation databases, hand searches of selected journals and published compilations of AAC theses and dissertations, and ancestry searches. To be included, studies had to meet stringent criteria. A coding manual and form facilitated data extraction in terms of participant characteristics, treatment characteristics, design and measurement, and outcomes.

Results: Nine single-subject experimental design (27 participants) and 2 group studies (98 participants) were included. Results indicated that AAC interventions do not impede speech production. In fact, most studies reported an increase in speech production. However, in-depth analyses revealed that the gains were rather modest.

Conclusions: Although AAC interventions do not appear to impede speech production and may result in increased speech production, the modest gains observed require realistic expectations among clinicians and other stakeholders. Future research should be more hypothesis driven and aim to identify predictive child characteristics, such as prior speech imitation and object exploration skills.

Key Words: augmentative and alternative communication, autism spectrum disorders, speech improvement, systematic review

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Tincani and K. Devis Quantitative Synthesis and Component Analysis of Single-Participant Studies on the Picture Exchange Communication System Remedial and Special Education, November 1, 2011; 32(6): 458 - 470. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Flippin, S. Reszka, and L. R. Watson Effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) on Communication and Speech for Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Meta-Analysis Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2010; 19(2): 178 - 195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Sennott and A. Bowker Autism, AAC, and Proloquo2Go Augmentative and Alternative Communication, December 1, 2009; 18(4): 137 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]