Research |
The University of Sydney
Queensland Clinical Trials Centre, University of Queensland, and Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Contact author: Mark Onslow, Director, Australian Stuttering Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, P.O. Box 170, Lidcombe, NSW 1825, Australia. E-mail: m.onslow{at}usyd.edu.au.
Purpose: The aims of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of telehealth delivery of the Lidcombe Program of Early Stuttering Intervention, compared with a control group, and to determine the number of children who could be regarded as "responders."
Method: A speech-language pathologist provided telehealth delivery of the Lidcombe Program during telephone consultations with parents in their homes, remote from the clinic. The study design was an open plan, parallel group, randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment. Children in the no-treatment control group who were still stuttering after 9 months then received the same treatment. The primary outcome measure was frequency of stuttering, gathered from audiotape recordings of participants' conversational speech in everyday, nontreatment situations, before and after treatment.
Results: Analysis of covariance showed a 73% decrease in frequency of stuttering at 9 months after randomization in the treatment group, as compared with the control group (95% confidence interval = 25%–90%, p = .02). Measures of treatment time showed that telehealth delivery of the Lidcombe Program requires around 3 times more resources than standard presentation.
Conclusions: Telehealth delivery of the Lidcombe Program is an efficacious treatment for preschool children who cannot receive the standard, clinic-based Lidcombe Program. Avenues for improving efficiency are considered.
Key Words: telehealth, Lidcombe Program, stuttering, early intervention
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. H. Ciccia, B. Whitford, M. Krumm, and K. McNeal Improving the access of young urban children to speech, language and hearing screening via telehealth Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, July 1, 2011; 17(5): 240 - 244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. O'Brian and M. Onslow Clinical management of stuttering in children and adults BMJ, June 24, 2011; 342(jun24_1): d3742 - d3742. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Irani and R. Gabel Intensive Stuttering Therapy With Telepractice Follow-up: A Case Study Fluency and Fluency Disorders, February 1, 2011; 21(1): 11 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Grogan-Johnson, R. Alvares, L. Rowan, and N. Creaghead A pilot study comparing the effectiveness of speech language therapy provided by telemedicine with conventional on-site therapy Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, April 1, 2010; 16(3): 134 - 139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Onslow, M. Jones, S. O'Brian, R. Menzies, and A. Packman Defining, Identifying, and Evaluating Clinical Trials of Stuttering Treatments: A Tutorial for Clinicians Am J Speech Lang Pathol, November 1, 2008; 17(4): 401 - 415. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Justice Treatment Research Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2008; 17(3): 210 - 211. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Rousseau, M. Onslow, A. Packman, and M. Jones Comparisons of Audio and Audiovisual Measures of Stuttering Frequency and Severity in Preschool-Age Children Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2008; 17(2): 173 - 178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||