American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol.17 81-91 February 2008. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/007)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CEUs available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCauley, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Strand, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McCauley, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Strand, E. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research

A Review of Standardized Tests of Nonverbal Oral and Speech Motor Performance in Children

Rebecca J. McCauley
University of Vermont, Burlington

Edythe A. Strand
The Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Contact author: Rebecca McCauley, 402 Pomeroy Hall, University of Vermont, 489 Main Street, Burlington, VT 05405-0010. E-mail: rebecca.mccauley{at}uvm.edu.

Purpose: To review the content and psychometric characteristics of 6 published tests currently available to aid in the study, diagnosis, and treatment of motor speech disorders in children.

Method: We compared the content of the 6 tests and critically evaluated the degree to which important psychometric characteristics support the tests' use for their defined purposes.

Results: The tests varied considerably in content and methods of test interpretation. Few of the tests documented efforts to support reliability and validity for their intended purposes, often when relevant information was probably available during the test's development.

Conclusions: Problems with the reviewed tests appear related to overly broad plans for test development and inadequate attention to relevant psychometric principles during the development process. Recommendations are offered for future test revisions and development efforts that can benefit from recent research in test development and in pediatric motor speech disorders.

Key Words: children, motor speech disorders, assessment, childhood apraxia of speech, dysarthria


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 NeurologyHome page
F. Liegeois, J.-D. Tournier, L. Pigdon, A. Connelly, and A. T. Morgan
Corticobulbar tract changes as predictors of dysarthria in childhood brain injury
Neurology, March 5, 2013; 80(10): 926 - 932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 AJSLPHome page
E. Maas, C. E. Butalla, and K. A. Farinella
Feedback Frequency in Treatment for Childhood Apraxia of Speech
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2012; 21(3): 239 - 257.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]