American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol.12 3-15 February 2003. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2003/048)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fey, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Finestack, L. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fey, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Finestack, L. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Ten Principles of Grammar Facilitation for Children With Specific Language Impairments

Marc E. Fey 1
Steven H. Long 2

Lizbeth H. Finestack 1

1 University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City
2 Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI

mfey{at}kumc.edu

Although they often have significant difficulties in other areas, most children with specific language impairment (SLI) have special difficulties with the understanding and use of grammar. Therefore, most of these children will require an intervention program that targets comprehension or production of grammatical form. Language interventionists are faced with the difficult task of developing comprehensive intervention programs that address the children's grammatical deficits while remaining sensitive to their other existing and predictable social, behavioral, and academic problems. The purpose of this article is to present and justify 10 principles that we regard as essential for planning adequate interventions for children with language-learning problems. These principles are relevant for all children with problems in the use of grammar, but they are especially appropriate for 3- to 8-year-old children with SLI. Although all of our examples are from English, the principles we have chosen are sufficiently broad to cut across many linguistic and cultural boundaries.

Key Words: specific language impairment, language intervention, grammar

Submitted on February 4, 2002
Accepted on July 9, 2002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AJSLPHome page
K. N. Washington
The Association Between Expressive Grammar Intervention and Social and Emergent Literacy Outcomes for Preschoolers With SLI
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2013; 22(1): 113 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
L. B. Green and J. S. Klecan-Aker
Teaching story grammar components to increase oral narrative ability: A group intervention study
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, October 1, 2012; 28(3): 263 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
V. Gutierrez-Clellen, G. Simon-Cereijido, and M. Sweet
Predictors of Second Language Acquisition in Latino Children With Specific Language Impairment
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2012; 21(1): 64 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
S. E. Wener and L. M. Archibald
Domain-specific treatment effects in children with language and/or working memory impairments: A pilot study
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, October 1, 2011; 27(3): 313 - 330.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
G. H. Poll
Increasing the Odds: Applying Emergentist Theory in Language Intervention
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, October 1, 2011; 42(4): 580 - 591.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
C. Binger, M. Maguire-Marshall, and J. Kent-Walsh
Using Aided AAC Models, Recasts, and Contrastive Targets to Teach Grammatical Morphemes to Children Who Use AAC
J Speech Lang Hear Res, February 1, 2011; 54(1): 160 - 176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Child Language Teaching and TherapyHome page
D. L. Wolfe and J. Heilmann
Simplified and expanded input in a focused stimulation program for a child with expressive language delay (ELD)
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, October 1, 2010; 26(3): 335 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
A. van Kleeck, A. L. Schwarz, M. Fey, A. Kaiser, J. Miller, and E. Weitzman
Should We Use Telegraphic or Grammatical Input in the Early Stages of Language Development With Children Who Have Language Impairments? A Meta-Analysis of the Research and Expert Opinion
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, February 1, 2010; 19(1): 3 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
T. M. O'Neil-Pirozzi
Feasibility and Benefit of Parent Participation in a Program Emphasizing Preschool Child Language Development While Homeless
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 252 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
L. H. Finestack and M. E. Fey
Evaluation of a Deductive Procedure to Teach Grammatical Inflections to Children With Language Impairment
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 289 - 302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Augmentative and Alternative CommunicationHome page
M. Fey
Thoughts on Grammar Intervention in AAC
Augmentative and Alternative Communication, June 1, 2008; 17(2): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Augmentative and Alternative CommunicationHome page
C. Binger
Grammatical Morpheme Intervention Issues for Students Who Use AAC
Augmentative and Alternative Communication, June 1, 2008; 17(2): 62 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Augmentative and Alternative CommunicationHome page
C. Binger
Classroom-Based Language Goals and Intervention for Children Who Use AAC: Back to Basics
Augmentative and Alternative Communication, April 1, 2008; 17(1): 20 - 26.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
K. Proctor-Williams and M. E. Fey
Recast Density and Acquisition of Novel Irregular Past Tense Verbs
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2007; 50(4): 1029 - 1047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJSLPHome page
L. S. DeThorne and R. W. Channell
Clinician-Child Interactions: Adjustments in Linguistic Complexity
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2007; 16(2): 119 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LSHSSHome page
S. L. Gillam and R. B. Gillam
Making Evidence-Based Decisions About Child Language Intervention in Schools
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, October 1, 2006; 37(4): 304 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JSLHRHome page
L. B. Leonard, S. M. Camarata, M. Pawlowska, B. Brown, and M. N. Camarata
Tense and Agreement Morphemes in the Speech of Children With Specific Language Impairment During Intervention: Phase 2
J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2006; 49(4): 749 - 770.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]