AJSLP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol.9 241-256 August 2000.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, N. P.
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, N. P.
Right arrow Articles by Maxwell, R. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effects of Pallidal Stimulation on Speech in Three Men With Severe Parkinson's Disease

Nancy Pearl Solomon 1
Amy S. McKee 1
Katherine J. Larson 1
Michael D. Nawrocki 1
Paul J. Tuite 1
Sharon Eriksen 1
Walter C. Low 1

Robert E. Maxwell 1

1 University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

solom006{at}umn.edu

This project examined the effects of pallidal stimulation and medication on speech in three men with severe Parkinson's disease. Two participants had bilateral pallidal stimulation and one had unilateral stimulation contralateral to a prior pallidotomy. Measures included general motor function, auditory perceptual characteristics of speech, intelligibility, interpause speech rate, and speech aerodynamics. All three participants had improved motor function (better mobility, reduced tremor and dyskinesia), but responses for speech varied widely. The participant with a prior unilateral pallidotomy and contralateral pallidal stimulation had alleviation of painful facial-mandibular dystonia so that he was more willing and better able to talk. One participant developed marked hypophonia postoperatively from a presumed pallidotomy or chronic stimulation effect as this result was not altered by deactivating the bilateral stimulators. The third participant demonstrated improved overall speech characterized by reduced vocal strain and tremulousness in the medication-on condition when the stimulators were activated. In the medication-off condition, he developed abnormal speech dysfluencies with bilateral pallidal stimulation, but this impairment was eliminated with medication or when the stimulators were deactivated. Careful exploration of speech sequelae after pallidal stimulation is essential to develop risk/benefit data for future neurosurgical candidates.

Key Words: Parkinson's disease, deep brain stimulation, pallidal stimulation, hypokinetic dysarthria, speech

Submitted on January 31, 2000
Accepted on June 15, 2000


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.