AJSLP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol.8 261-272 August 1999.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hadley, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hadley, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Validating a Rate-Based Measure of Early Grammatical Abilities

Unique Syntactic Types

Pamela A. Hadley 1
1 Arizona State University, Tempe

This paper introduces an alternative measure of grammatical development, unique syntactic types (UST), for use with young children with intervention goals focusing on the emergence of word combinations. A unique syntactic type refers to a unique combination of two or more words with syntactic status that could fit into the phrase structure of a more grammatically complete adult utterance. The measure is appropriate only for children in Brown's Stage I of language development (mean length of utterance [MLU] 1.00 to 2.00). It is intended to monitor the facility with which children deploy their grammatical knowledge under the realtime demands of conversation. The relationships between UST and existing measures of grammatical development were examined among 20 toddlers with specific language impairment to explore its validity. Similarly, measures of UST obtained on two separate days were compared to evaluate its reliability. Results revealed that UST demonstrates temporal reliability and is highly correlated with MLU (Brown, 1973) and total scores on the Index of Productive Syntax (Scarborough, 1990) at concurrent measurement points. Additionally, UST demonstrates predictive stability over 3- and 6-month intervals. These findings support the use of UST as an alternative measure for tracking the progress of children in this early stage of grammatical development. Data collection strategies for use in real practice settings are also discussed.

Key Words: assessment, early childhood, language disorders, syntax

Submitted on November 30, 1998
Accepted on April 9, 1999


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.