AJSLP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol.4 99-104 November 1995.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fink, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bluestone, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Fink, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Bluestone, R.

Syntax Stimulation Revisited

An Analysis of Generalization of Treatment Effects

Ruth B. Fink 1
Myrna F. Schwartz 2
Elizabeth Rochon 2
Jessica L. Myers 1
Gail Simon Socolof 3

Ruth Bluestone 4

1 Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA
2 Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
3 Winifred Masterson Burke Medical Research Institute, White Plains, NY
4 Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA

A multiple-probes variant of the multiple-baseline across-behaviors design was used to study the extent of generalization associated with syntax stimulation (SS) training. To assess whether acquisition of specific structures generalized across tasks, we used a specially designed sentence elicitation probe, Picture Description with Structure Modeling (PDSM; Fink et al., 1994). To assess whether training enhanced morphosyntactic production in connected speech, we used the coding scheme developed by Saffran, Berndt, and Schwartz (1989). Four subjects with chronic nonfluent aphasia were trained to produce active, passive, and embedded sentences using materials and procedures from the Helm Elicited Language Program for Syntax Stimulation (Helm-Estabrooks, 1981). These sentence structures were trained in successive phases with generalization probes administered before and after each phase. Three subjects with aphasia served as controls. Strong within-task generalization was observed and, in contrast to previous studies, generalization to the novel sentence elicitation task (PDSM). SS training did not yield measurable gains in narrative production.

Key Words: aphasia treatment generalization, agrammatism, syntax stimulation, HELPSS







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.