AJSLP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol.4 186-192 November 1995.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wambaugh, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kalinyak, M. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wambaugh, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kalinyak, M. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Spectral Analysis of Sound Errors in Persons With Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia

Julie L. Wambaugh 1
Patrick J. Doyle 1
Joan E. West 1

Michelene M. Kalinyak 1

1 Aphasia Rehabilitation Research Laboratory and Clinic Highland Drive VA Medical Center, Pittsburgh

Incorrect productions of [int] were compared to correct productions of [s] and [int] in two subjects with apraxia of speech and aphasia. Frequencies of the peak spectral energy (FPSE) were extracted from power spectrums of monosyllabic words. In addition, in order to verify that [s] and [int] could be differentiated in terms of FPSE, we obtained speech samples of correct productions of [s] and [int] from two normal male speakers. A perceptual task was also completed by requiring two listeners to categorize recorded productions. Results revealed significant differences among sound categories for Subject 1, but not for Subject 2. That is, Subject 1's incorrect [int] productions were acoustically different from his homonymous [s] productions, whereas the productions were not acoustically different for Subject 2. These findings suggest that Subject 1's /int/errors were not errors of substitution, but would be more appropriately characterized as distortions. Conversely, this spectral analysis did not clarify the nature of Subject 2's incorrect /int/ productions; both substitution and distortion remained possible appropriate descriptors of his sound errors.

Key Words: apraxia, acoustics, aphasia, speech, spectral analysis


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.