AJSLP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol.4 118-123 November 1995.
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brookshire, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholas, L. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Brookshire, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Nicholas, L. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Performance Deviations in the Connected Speech of Adults With No Brain Damage and Adults With Aphasia

Robert H. Brookshire 1
Linda E. Nicholas 1

1 VA Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, and University of Minnesota, Minneapolis

A rule-based system was used to score performance deviations in the connected speech of 40 adults with no brain damage, 10 adults with fluent aphasia, and 10 adults with nonfluent aphasia. Performance deviations were productions that did not qualify as words or as correct information units (CIUs) (Nicholas & Brookshire, 1993). They were assigned to 2 nonword categories (part-words or unintelligible productions and nonword filler) and 8 non-CIU categories (inaccurate words, false starts, unnecessary exact repetitions, nonspecific or vague words, filler words, the word and, offtask or irrelevant words, and uncategorizable productions). Speech samples from both aphasic groups contained significantly greater percentages of inaccurate words, false starts, and part-words or unintelligible productions than those of the non-brain-damaged group. In comparison with the non-brain-damaged group, speech samples from the fluent aphasic group contained significantly greater percentages of unnecessary exact repetition, whereas those of the nonfluent aphasic group contained significantly greater percentages of the word and and nonword filler. The only significant difference between the two aphasic groups was for nonword filler, with the nonfluent aphasic group producing more than the fluent aphasic group. Individual aphasic subjects showed performance that generally was consistent with that of their group.

Key Words: aphasia, discourse (production), deviations


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.