Skip to main page content

• HOME
• Current
• Archive
• Contact us
• Help
• Custom Print FAQ

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Custom Print Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal My Folders Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nippold, M. A. Articles by Tomblin, J. B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nippold, M. A. Articles by Tomblin, J. B. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Expository Discourse in Adolescents With Language Impairments: Examining Syntactic Development

J. Bruce Tomblin
University of Iowa, Iowa City

Contact author: Marilyn A. Nippold, Communication Disorders and Sciences, College of Education, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403. E-mail: nippold{at}uoregon.edu.

Purpose: This study examined syntactic development in a large cohort of adolescents. At kindergarten, each participant had been identified as having specific language impairment (SLI), nonspecific language impairment (NLI), or typical language development (TLD).

Method: The participants (n = 444) had a mean age of 13;11 (years;months; range = 12;10–15;5). Language samples were elicited in 2 genres, conversational and expository, and analyzed for mean length of T-unit and subordinate clause production.

Results: Mean length of T-unit and the use of nominal, relative, and adverbial clauses were greater during the expository task than the conversational task for all groups. Thus, even the SLI and NLI groups produced longer sentences containing greater amounts of subordination when speaking in the expository genre than in the conversational genre. No group differences were revealed by the conversational task. However, on the expository task, the TLD group outperformed both the SLI and NLI groups on mean length of T-unit, and the TLD group outperformed the NLI group on relative clause use.

Conclusions: Speech-language pathologists may wish to employ expository discourse tasks rather than conversational tasks to examine syntactic development in adolescents.

Key Words: adolescents, language impairment, complex syntax, expository discourse

CiteULike    Connotea    Delicious    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Karasinski Behavior Problems and Social Functioning in Adolescents With Language Impairment Language Learning and Education, March 1, 2013; 20(2): 36 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Moyle, C. Karasinski, S. E. Weismer, and B. K. Gorman Grammatical Morphology in School-Age Children With and Without Language Impairment: A Discriminant Function Analysis Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, October 1, 2011; 42(4): 550 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Nippold and L. Sun Expository Writing in Children and Adolescents: A Classroom Assessment Tool Language Learning and Education, October 1, 2010; 17(3): 100 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Word of Mouth Word of Mouth, January 1, 2010; 21(3): 1 - 16. [PDF]

				M. A. Nippold School-Age Children Talk About Chess: Does Knowledge Drive Syntactic Complexity? J Speech Lang Hear Res, August 1, 2009; 52(4): 856 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Nippold, T. C. Mansfield, J. L. Billow, and J. B. Tomblin Syntactic Development in Adolescents With a History of Language Impairments: A Follow-Up Investigation Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2009; 18(3): 241 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]