Research |
University of Toledo, Toledo, OH
University of Wyoming, Laramie
Montclair State University, Montclair, NJ
University of Texas at Austin
Contact author: Laura Justice, Preschool Language & Literacy Lab, Curry School of Education, Box 400873, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904-4273. Email: ljustice{at}virginia.edu
PURPOSE: This research was conducted to develop a clinical toolthe Index of Narrative Microstructure (INMIS)that would parsimoniously account for important microstructural aspects of narrative production for school-age children. The study provides field test age- and grade-based INMIS values to aid clinicians in making normative judgments about microstructural aspects of pupils' narrative performance.
METHOD: Narrative samples using a single-picture elicitation context were collected from 250 children age 512 years and then transcribed and segmented into T-units. A T-unit consists of a single main clause and any dependent constituents. The narrative transcripts were then coded and analyzed to document a comprehensive set of microstructural indices.
RESULTS: Factor analysis indicated that narrative microstructure consisted of 2 moderately related factors. The Productivity factor primarily comprised measures of word output, lexical diversity, and T-unit output. The Complexity factor comprised measures of syntactic organization, with mean length of T-units in words and proportion of complex T-units loading most strongly. Principal components analysis was used to provide a linear combination of 8 variables to approximate the 2 factors. Formulas for calculating a student's performance on the 2 factors using 8 narrative measures are provided.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provided a method for professionals to calculate INMIS scores for narrative Productivity and Complexity for comparison against field test data for age (5- to 12-year-old) or grade (kindergarten to Grade 6) groupings. INMIS scores complement other tools in evaluating a child's narrative performance specifically and language abilities more generally.
Key Words: narrative development, narrative assessment, language assessment, school-age language
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Technorati
Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Kit-Sum To, S. F. Stokes, H.-T. Cheung, and B. T'sou Narrative Assessment for Cantonese-Speaking Children J Speech Lang Hear Res, June 1, 2010; 53(3): 648 - 669. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Heilmann, J. F. Miller, A. Nockerts, and C. Dunaway Properties of the Narrative Scoring Scheme Using Narrative Retells in Young School-Age Children Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2010; 19(2): 154 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Kelly Interpreting the "Sounds of Silence" in Dual Language Preschools in Qatar: Teacher's Use of Story Retelling and Language Sampling Communication Disorders and Sciences in Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Populations, March 1, 2010; 17(1): 11 - 24. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Horton-Ikard Cohesive Adequacy in the Narrative Samples of School-Age Children Who Use African American English Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, October 1, 2009; 40(4): 393 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Hoffman The Utility of School-Age Narrative Microstructure Indices: INMIS and the Proportion of Restricted Utterances Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, October 1, 2009; 40(4): 365 - 375. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. S. Puranik, L. J. Lombardino, and L. J. P. Altmann Assessing the Microstructure of Written Language Using a Retelling Paradigm Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2008; 17(2): 107 - 120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. V. Hayward, R. B. Gillam, and P. Lien Retelling a Script-Based Story: Do Children With and Without Language Impairments Focus on Script and Story Elements? Am J Speech Lang Pathol, August 1, 2007; 16(3): 235 - 245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||