AJSLP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol.12 28-39 February 2003. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2003/050)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Carson, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hime, L. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Carson, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hime, L. K.

Phonological Profiles of 2-Year-Olds With Delayed Language Development

Predicting Clinical Outcomes at Age 3

Cecyle Perry Carson 1
Thomas Klee 2
David K. Carson 1

Linda K. Hime 1

1 University of Wyoming, Laramie
2 University of Newcastle Upon Tyne, England

ckperry{at}uwyo.edu

Twenty-eight 2-year-olds were screened for language development using the Language Development Survey (LDS; L. Rescorla, 1989) and underwent a clinical evaluation within a month following LDS administration. Six measures of phonological development were derived from 20-min language samples of parent-child play interactions, including number of different consonants, number of different consonants in the initial and final positions, number of different consonant clusters in the initial and final position, and percentage of closed syllables shapes. Comparisons were made among 3 groups: (a) those who screened positive on the LDS (LDS+) who were within normal limits on follow-up, (b) those who were identified as language delayed (LD), and (c) children who were language normal (LN). Results revealed that children who were LDS+ and LD had comparable phonetic profiles. The LD group had significantly lower scores on all phonetic measures tested, as compared to the LN group. Clinical recommendations were available on a subset of 13 children who were reassessed at age 3. Children who received "monitor" or "treatment" recommendations at age 3 had significantly lower z scores on measures of phonetic development recorded at 2 years of age than toddlers who received a recommendation of "no concerns" at 3 years. Our preliminary findings indicated that the more delayed the 2-year-old child was in phonological development, the more at risk the child was for continuing delays at age 3.

Key Words: language delay, phonological development, clinical outcome, toddlers

Submitted on September 10, 2001
Accepted on February 22, 2002







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.