American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol.10 269-273 August 2001. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2001/024)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrowCustom Print
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gillam, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Friel-Patti, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gillam, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Friel-Patti, S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Delicious   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Looking Back

A Summary of Five Exploratory Studies of Fast ForWord

Ronald B. Gillam 1
Diane Frome Loeb 2

Sandy Friel-Patti 3
1 The University of Texas at Austin
2 The University of Kansas, Lawrence
3 The University of Texas at Dallas

rbg{at}mail.utexas.edu

This article summarizes the papers in this issue of AJSLP that report the results of Phase I and Phase II clinical trials of Fast ForWord (FFW). Our primary purpose is to integrate the findings of these studies as they relate to the implications for future Phase III clinical trial studies. We discuss the replication of earlier findings by independent researchers, the uniqueness of FFW, new findings from FFW with respect to literacy and intervention settings, and finally, the underlying theoretical framework of FFW.

Key Words: language intervention, Fast ForWord, specific language impairment, childhood language disorders, reading

Submitted on April 10, 2001
Accepted on June 29, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Learn DisabilHome page
C. Stevens, B. Harn, D. J. Chard, J. Currin, D. Parisi, and H. Neville
Examining the Role of Attention and Instruction in At-Risk Kindergarteners: Electrophysiological Measures of Selective Auditory Attention Before and After an Early Literacy Intervention
J Learn Disabil, January 1, 2013; 46(1): 73 - 86.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 AJSLPHome page
L. S. DeThorne, C. J. Johnson, L. Walder, and J. Mahurin-Smith
When "Simon Says" Doesn't Work: Alternatives to Imitation for Facilitating Early Speech Development
Am J Speech Lang Pathol, May 1, 2009; 18(2): 133 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 LSHSSHome page
T. A. Ukrainetz, C. L. Ross, and H. M. Harm
An Investigation of Treatment Scheduling for Phonemic Awareness With Kindergartners Who Are at Risk for Reading Difficulties
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, January 1, 2009; 40(1): 86 - 100.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 LSHSSHome page
T. A. Ukrainetz
The Implications of RTI and EBP for SLPs: Commentary on L. M. Justice
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch, October 1, 2006; 37(4): 298 - 303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Br Med BullHome page
P. J Bailey and M. J Snowling
Auditory processing and the development of language and literacy
Br. Med. Bull., October 1, 2002; 63(1): 135 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]