AJSLP
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology Vol.10 216-230 August 2001. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2001/020)
© American Speech-Language-Hearing Association

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow My Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loeb, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Fey, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Loeb, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Fey, M. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Language Changes Associated With Fast ForWord-Language

Evidence From Case Studies

Diane Frome Loeb 1
Christene Stoke 1

Marc E. Fey 1

1 The University of Kansas, Lawrence

dianelo{at}ku.edu

Based principally on reports of two experimental investigations, the Scientific Learning Corporation claims that Fast ForWord-Language (FFW-L) yields 1-1/2 to 3 years language gain over a 6-week period. We evaluated various aspects of this claim by measuring the language changes of four children who received FFW-L language intervention in their homes. Language change was assessed immediately following intervention and 3 months later, using standardized language measures, spontaneous measures of syntactic complexity, reading measures, pragmatic measures, and parent and teacher reports. Three of the four children successfully completed FFW-L, and all made gains on some of the same standardized measures used by P. Tallal et al. (1996), although the improvements we observed were generally smaller than those previously reported. All children also made gains on measures of pragmatic performance. However, very few changes were observed in the children's Developmental Sentence Scores (DSSs), indicating that gains in productive use of grammar changed only marginally. One child showed evidence of gains in standard assessment of his phonological awareness skills. According to questionnaire data, parents and teachers did not report many differences in performance after intervention; however, parental satisfaction with the program was generally high. Sixty-one percent of the gains observed at posttesting were maintained 3 months following intervention; however, a number also were not maintained. Of the total 595 items assessed at pretest and posttest, significant positive change occurred on 58 or 10% of the items. Our findings suggest that, although FFW-L delivered at home by parents may lead to some important changes in children's performance on structured tasks, broad, dramatic gains in spontaneous language use are less likely and may not be long-lasting. Future experimental investigations should include measures of pragmatic performance to substantiate the preliminary findings of these case studies.

Key Words: Fast ForWord, language intervention, school-age, computer-based intervention, modified speech

Submitted on April 18, 2000
Accepted on June 29, 2001


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All ASHA Journals AJA AJSLP JSLHR LSHSS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.